Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
Thursday, February 28, 2019
Vivienne Westwood Isolde Pearl Pendant SKU:8521768
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
It is quite clear, and we are faced with this constantly that people might misunderstand the object that is conceptually wrong to reflect his nature. Previous knowledge of the subject may be insufficient to describe a new object, etc. of a Moving object on another planet as a living being, in fact, may be non-living moving creature, or worse - both. By the way, recently scientists came to exactly the same position when trying to establish the boundaries between the living and the inanimate, between the animal and plant world. Was unexpectedly discovered creature, which just on the basis of the old concept of living and nonliving, plant and animal life, that were neither the one nor the other, or rather they can be attributed to those and others. Here already it needed a new concept to a satisfactory manner to reflect the essence of the new object. It seems to me, and until today, this concept is not represented. But as people, mandatory first tries to insert a new object into the old conceptual knowledge, then this knowledge takes the form as possible true knowledge, or conceptual-hypothetical knowledge. My idea of the object can be as loyal. and not true just because it is based on past knowledge. That is what it stays until until it confirms or does not confirm the practice, and in specific terms - the movement of an object, which exhibits new features, each of which finds its conceptual expression in the consciousness of the subject. With the full set of basic signs of the object or incorporated in the well-known concept or produces a new concept. If the subject correctly understood the object, right conceptually it reflected in his mind, then his ideas about the movement of the object coincide with the real motion of the object. If the subject does not correctly reflect the substance of the object, the movement of the latter will diverge with the views of the subject. In turn, this means that the subject can not act against the object. Not understanding the essence, the nature of the movement of the object, the subject can not build their actions. For example, if I can't decide against moving object whether it is alive or not alive, then of course I can't determine the nature of their actions in relation to this object.
1 comment:
It is quite clear, and we are faced with this constantly that people might misunderstand the object that is conceptually wrong to reflect his nature. Previous knowledge of the subject may be insufficient to describe a new object, etc. of a Moving object on another planet as a living being, in fact, may be non-living moving creature, or worse - both.
By the way, recently scientists came to exactly the same position when trying to establish the boundaries between the living and the inanimate, between the animal and plant world. Was unexpectedly discovered creature, which just on the basis of the old concept of living and nonliving, plant and animal life, that were neither the one nor the other, or rather they can be attributed to those and others. Here already it needed a new concept to a satisfactory manner to reflect the essence of the new object. It seems to me, and until today, this concept is not represented.
But as people, mandatory first tries to insert a new object into the old conceptual knowledge, then this knowledge takes the form as possible true knowledge, or conceptual-hypothetical knowledge. My idea of the object can be as loyal. and not true just because it is based on past knowledge. That is what it stays until until it confirms or does not confirm the practice, and in specific terms - the movement of an object, which exhibits new features, each of which finds its conceptual expression in the consciousness of the subject. With the full set of basic signs of the object or incorporated in the well-known concept or produces a new concept.
If the subject correctly understood the object, right conceptually it reflected in his mind, then his ideas about the movement of the object coincide with the real motion of the object. If the subject does not correctly reflect the substance of the object, the movement of the latter will diverge with the views of the subject. In turn, this means that the subject can not act against the object. Not understanding the essence, the nature of the movement of the object, the subject can not build their actions. For example, if I can't decide against moving object whether it is alive or not alive, then of course I can't determine the nature of their actions in relation to this object.
Post a Comment