Alan Rickman's secret wedding to partner of 50 years
Telegraph.co.uk-Apr. 24, 2015
He presented her with a £130 gold wedding band that “she never wears”. The actor seldom discusses his private life but in a rare mention of Rima, 68, a former ...
Charles and Camilla get in a flap as eagle shows who's boss
Express.co.uk-Jul. 29, 2015
At the show, which traditionally marks the end of the summer 'term' for the Royal Family, thousands of well-wishers turned out to greet Charles and Camilla and ...
Look How Much Princess Kate's Bridesmaid Has Grown Up
GoodHousekeeping.com (blog)-May 18, 2015
Anyone who watched the Royal Wedding (or just saw the stunning photos after it was all over) remembers the little flower-crowned girl who waved along with ...
A slice of the Queen's wedding cake has sold 68 years on for ...
hellomagazine.com-Sep. 4, 2015
Until now, the piece of wedding cake had been kept by an unnamed woman from Hove, East Sussex, whose father attended the royal wedding. It was bought by ...
1 comment:
courses were set belonging to the real authors (great
from mythical characters from the great great figures - consecrated and
sanctifying) initially to the extent that the author could be punished, that is
the extent to which these discourses could be imposed thereon. The discourse in our
culture (and undoubtedly many others) initially was not a product thing
property; it was mostly an act - the act which was placed in
the bipolar field of the sacred and profane, lawful and unlawful,
reverent and blasphemous. historically, before becoming the property
included in the circuit of ownership, the discourse was a gesture, paired with
risk. And when texts were set to property when was
issued strict copyright laws, about the relations between the author and
by the publisher on the rights of retyping, etc., that is, to the end of XVIII - the beginning
Nineteenth century,- at this moment the possibility of pristupanja that before
belonged to act of Scripture, began to take the form of imperative
typical of the literature. As if the author, since, as he was
placed in the system of ownership, characteristic of our society,
compensated for the resulting status that re has regained its former
bipolar field of discourse, systematically practicing prestupnie,
restoring the danger of writing, which on the other hand was
guaranteed benefits inherent in ownership.
On the other hand, the function of the author is not sent to all discourses
a kind of universal and constant way. In our civilization not always alone
and those texts required the attribution of some author. There was a time when,
for example, those texts that we would today call "literary"
(stories, tales, epics, tragedies, comedies)
Post a Comment