The assignment of a certain population of objects or for individual object name, followed strictly or not so strictly fixed certain content, helps quick understanding of people and adapt them in solving new problems, as well as the transfer of knowledge, experience to other people and generations. Calling the name of the person indicates a certain set of objects with specific characteristics, and thereby specifies the class of the interacting objects, which eliminates the need to examine each object individually. Back to the space. What man calls space, there is a special set of external attitude objects provided for the same particular connection and relationships i.e. filled with subjective content, caused in turn by specific tasks. It should be noted that this representation is conceptual and hypothetical, i.e., perhaps true education. The subjectivity of this phenomenon is that people using the nature to create new objects and the presence in nature of the objects with given properties, creates a new object, in this case space. It is his personal view, personal space and a unique formation due to the fact that every time he solves a unique private specific task. And since any problem in principle, by definition, is unique, that each person creates their own unique space. But the creation of personal space is not a unique property of the human species. This property has everyone at least a living object in the world. The objectivity and universality of such phenomena as space, is that it always exists as a reality because of the diverse actions of many people and objects will lead to the formation of a special system of objects with connection between them. The objectivity of space is also confirmed by the fact that the objects that form it, have some properties that allow to form a new object. The objectivity of space in the fact that it always exists in nature as an opportunity, i.e. the potential, which allows, in particular, his man and create. That is to say, to experimental condition received from nature a priori, i.e. before experience (Kant), founded by someone over a program that always exists in possibility. As a possibility it remains until, until the sought-after objects of the world, including man. Once claimed, the possibility becomes a reality, independent object or a posteriori, i.e., experienced, knowledge. By virtue of a simple logical inference spaces are infinitely many: how many objects have many spaces, how many relationships between objects, so many spaces, how many tasks, so many spaces. And because of all this infinite set, then spaces are endless. Each of them is unique, i.e. fundamentally different from the other, while it forms a new reality that is responsible, in particular, among other things, the development of nature and matter. However, due to the limited set of objects and links (links are in turn a set of transitional objects), between them, spaces is also a bounded set, which man usually operates in daily practice when dealing with their private, specific tasks.
1 comment:
The assignment of a certain population of objects or for individual object name, followed strictly or not so strictly fixed certain content, helps quick understanding of people and adapt them in solving new problems, as well as the transfer of knowledge, experience to other people and generations. Calling the name of the person indicates a certain set of objects with specific characteristics, and thereby specifies the class of the interacting objects, which eliminates the need to examine each object individually.
Back to the space. What man calls space, there is a special set of external attitude objects provided for the same particular connection and relationships i.e. filled with subjective content, caused in turn by specific tasks. It should be noted that this representation is conceptual and hypothetical, i.e., perhaps true education.
The subjectivity of this phenomenon is that people using the nature to create new objects and the presence in nature of the objects with given properties, creates a new object, in this case space. It is his personal view, personal space and a unique formation due to the fact that every time he solves a unique private specific task. And since any problem in principle, by definition, is unique, that each person creates their own unique space. But the creation of personal space is not a unique property of the human species. This property has everyone at least a living object in the world.
The objectivity and universality of such phenomena as space, is that it always exists as a reality because of the diverse actions of many people and objects will lead to the formation of a special system of objects with connection between them. The objectivity of space is also confirmed by the fact that the objects that form it, have some properties that allow to form a new object. The objectivity of space in the fact that it always exists in nature as an opportunity, i.e. the potential, which allows, in particular, his man and create.
That is to say, to experimental condition received from nature a priori, i.e. before experience (Kant), founded by someone over a program that always exists in possibility. As a possibility it remains until, until the sought-after objects of the world, including man. Once claimed, the possibility becomes a reality, independent object or a posteriori, i.e., experienced, knowledge.
By virtue of a simple logical inference spaces are infinitely many: how many objects have many spaces, how many relationships between objects, so many spaces, how many tasks, so many spaces. And because of all this infinite set, then spaces are endless.
Each of them is unique, i.e. fundamentally different from the other, while it forms a new reality that is responsible, in particular, among other things, the development of nature and matter. However, due to the limited set of objects and links (links are in turn a set of transitional objects), between them, spaces is also a bounded set, which man usually operates in daily practice when dealing with their private, specific tasks.
Post a Comment