No object other critics, the plan known and popular book by T. Kuhn "Structure of scientific revolutions": kun only describes certain signs of paradigms, and Foucault strives to distinguish genuine cognitive structure. Wine that is not quite possible Foucault, not in strength plan, but in nesistematichno method, led to the "folly of development mind" in the transition from one episteme to another (piaget). However, perhaps the most important issue for discussion which are reduced all other disputes -- and the facts in Foucault's conception, and its philosophical and a methodological sense, is the problem of man and history. In order to learn how to act intelligently in the present and to build future, people must learn to understand his own past -- time culture that pervades and largely defines it. Action the more present and aspirations for the future involve going beyond that cash given to the person revealing it has not opened yet possibilities. For a modern person a kind of reconnaissance this ability to go beyond our limits is knowledge history. History can not in the proper sense of the word to be converted, but it can be reinterpreted.For the modern human history-is not Museum of curiosity and is not a textbook with ready-made recipes for action all occasions. History does not give universal recommendations , but it hides a lot of meanings, a lot more that draws from it each specific era, choosing and developing only one and lowering other features of the humanistic understanding of the past.
1 comment:
No object other critics, the plan known and popular
book by T. Kuhn "Structure of scientific revolutions": kun only describes certain
signs of paradigms, and Foucault strives to distinguish genuine cognitive
structure. Wine that is not quite possible Foucault, not in strength
plan, but in nesistematichno method, led to the "folly of development
mind" in the transition from one episteme to another (piaget).
However, perhaps the most important issue for discussion which are reduced
all other disputes -- and the facts in Foucault's conception, and its philosophical and
a methodological sense, is the problem of man and history.
In order to learn how to act intelligently in the present and to build
future, people must learn to understand his own past --
time culture that pervades and largely defines it. Action
the more present and aspirations for the future involve going beyond
that cash given to the person revealing it has not opened yet
possibilities. For a modern person a kind of reconnaissance
this ability to go beyond our limits is knowledge
history. History can not in the proper sense of the word to be converted, but
it can be reinterpreted.For the modern human history-is not
Museum of curiosity and is not a textbook with ready-made recipes for action
all occasions. History does not give universal recommendations , but it
hides a lot of meanings, a lot more that draws from it
each specific era, choosing and developing only one and lowering
other features of the humanistic understanding of the past.
Post a Comment