The end of the classic episteme means the emergence of new objects knowledge is life, labor, language-and thereby creates the possibility modern Sciences -- biology, political economy, linguistics. If the classical episteme the basic way of existence of objects of knowledge was the space, which sort of identity and difference, in the modern episteme, this role in time, i.e., main method existence of objects of cognition becomes the story. The reason for the formation of these new Sciences Foucault sees not the accumulation of knowledge and clarification of methods knowledge of the classical era, but the change of internal structure space knowledge -- configuration episteme. Characteristic modern episteme-is the emergence of life, labor, language in their internal strength in their own being, the laws which are not reducible to logical the laws of thinking. As a result, in place of the classical exchange of wealth raises economic production -- labor, is not determined by game representations of the buyer, but the real need of the manufacturer. In natural history on the spot classification of external signs on the identities and differences revealed previously hidden and mysterious phenomenon -- the "life" and the opposition organic and inorganic, living and nonliving replace the traditional for classical thinking, the articulation of objects of knowledge in minerals plants, and animals. In studies of the language at the place of the theory of names occurs the theory of inflections: one searched for modern languages to their original layer where the primary roots are connected to the primary meanings, and the second offers for the study of living languages with a complete set of systems of grammatical laws, not reducible to any universal the laws of representation and thinking.
1 comment:
The end of the classic episteme means the emergence of new objects
knowledge is life, labor, language-and thereby creates the possibility
modern Sciences -- biology, political economy, linguistics. If
the classical episteme the basic way of existence of objects of knowledge was
the space, which sort of identity and difference, in
the modern episteme, this role in time, i.e., main method
existence of objects of cognition becomes the story. The reason for the formation of these
new Sciences Foucault sees not the accumulation of knowledge and clarification of methods
knowledge of the classical era, but the change of internal structure
space knowledge -- configuration episteme. Characteristic
modern episteme-is the emergence of life, labor, language in their internal
strength in their own being, the laws which are not reducible to logical
the laws of thinking. As a result, in place of the classical exchange of wealth
raises economic production -- labor, is not determined by game
representations of the buyer, but the real need of the manufacturer. In natural
history on the spot classification of external signs on the identities and differences
revealed previously hidden and mysterious phenomenon -- the "life" and the opposition
organic and inorganic, living and nonliving replace the traditional
for classical thinking, the articulation of objects of knowledge in minerals
plants, and animals. In studies of the language at the place of the theory of names occurs
the theory of inflections: one searched for modern languages to their original layer
where the primary roots are connected to the primary meanings, and the second
offers for the study of living languages with a complete set of
systems of grammatical laws, not reducible to any universal
the laws of representation and thinking.
Post a Comment