Saturday, November 30, 2019
Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: All About Star Jones' Wedding Gown that Made Her F...
Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: All About Star Jones' Wedding Gown that Made Her F...: All About Star Jones' Wedding Gown that Made Her Feel Like ... PEOPLE.com - Mar. 28, 2018 Star Jones tied the knot over the we...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Therefore, the notion of space, i.e. the kind of education that turns out to be dominant, and therefore very important for a person to solve his problem. Thus the concept of space is the common, within which develops the unity of place time and action, unless, again, it is common, in this case, the space became the dominant object.
But the dominant object can be place, ie the position of the person on something. If it is this state and that a person's position on something is becoming dominant, it subjugates all of the unity of place, time and action. Moreover it can subdue and space as an object. The difference is that in this case the space acts as a smaller community the object relative to the object place.
It is necessary to distinguish the concept of volume, content and proportion. Often, the use of the same term leads to a logical contradiction. So, space has never been used in the framework of the concept of space. But almost always the concept of space used in the framework of the concept of space. However, the content of the concept can vary depending on who or what appears dominant. Therefore, the concept of space can be dominant on the place, but the place can be dominant relative to space.
So when I race the car at the appointed meeting place, the notion of space (machines), keeping its value (I can find), is the subordinate object relative to the places I must go. But at the same time, the driver's seat on which I sit, is subordinate to the concept of space. Within the space of your local machine observed the unity of place, time and action. In the framework of the places I tend to get, has its unity of place and time and action. Is more common the object relative to the local unity of place, time and action. But the place where I aim itself, in turn, is a local unity of place, time and action in relation to another, more General spaces, such as urban space. Equally it could be a place, time or action and its own unity of place, time and action.
We emphasize that for the constant term of its contents depending on the external situation can change and often very significantly. That it is impossible in one case (place, time, or action), is absolutely necessary in another case (place, time and action). Often there is more: clearly stated specific content of a term can be fully applied in all other situations. The result is a logical absurdity and impossibility to solve the problem. Mathematics has long been understood that, for example, the mathematical term "unit" can change its content depending on what it is attributed to. Everyone understands that there is a unit as a mathematical category with its specific content, but there are practical, that is to say, the content (e.g., one Apple) and they do not mix, confuse their contents. Nothing otherwise it would be impossible to count.
Post a Comment