Analysis of wealth, like universal grammar and natural history, inept is not the predecessor of modern political economy, but the domain of knowledge managed by its own laws. If the economic thought of the Renaissance treats the money as a substitute of wealth or even wealth itself, in the seventeenth century -- is only a tool representation and analysis of wealth, and the wealth -- the content presented money. The spores mercantilists and the physiocrats, to the classical episteme there was a General thinking framework: money treated as symbol whose value is changed-reduced or increases in the exchange process. The overall comparison shows that the analysis of wealth, natural history and General grammar are subject to the classical episteme single laws. For example, the functional role of value in the structure analysis of wealth similar to the role of noun and verb in the structure of the universal grammar and at the same time the role of the concept of "structure" in natural history. The possibility of mutual transitions between judgment and value in language, between structure and characteristic in natural history, between cost and price in the structure of the analysis of wealth is determined by and based on the continuity the ratio of existence and representation (representation) is "metaphysical", the dominant classical philosophical thinking, which serves as the justification specific scientific knowledge in this era. In the modern era is the ratio flips: the modern scientific dominance occurs in the philosophical, and contemporary philosophical -- on the site of a former scientific. In indeed, when political economy examines the question of the relationship between the value and price, biology studies the correlation of structures and features within biological organization of living beings, and Philology seeks to understand the relationship of formal structures with verbal values, thus science XX century involved the dismemberment of the space, where classic the episteme stretched the continuity of the relationship between thinking and being. And the place where formerly housed the scientific discipline, now fill the philosophical discipline cycle: the problems of formalization now connected with the analysis of relationships between logic and ontology, issues interpretation -- identifying the ratio of time and sense, etc.
1 comment:
Analysis of wealth, like universal grammar and natural history,
inept is not the predecessor of modern political economy, but
the domain of knowledge managed by its own laws. If
the economic thought of the Renaissance treats the money as a substitute of wealth
or even wealth itself, in the seventeenth century -- is only a tool
representation and analysis of wealth, and the wealth -- the content presented
money. The spores mercantilists and the physiocrats, to the classical episteme
there was a General thinking framework: money treated as
symbol whose value is changed-reduced or
increases in the exchange process.
The overall comparison shows that the analysis of wealth, natural
history and General grammar are subject to the classical episteme single
laws. For example, the functional role of value in the structure
analysis of wealth similar to the role of noun and verb in the structure of the universal
grammar and at the same time the role of the concept of "structure" in natural history.
The possibility of mutual transitions between judgment and value in language, between
structure and characteristic in natural history, between cost and price in
the structure of the analysis of wealth is determined by and based on the continuity
the ratio of existence and representation (representation) is "metaphysical",
the dominant classical philosophical thinking, which serves as the justification
specific scientific knowledge in this era. In the modern era is
the ratio flips: the modern scientific dominance occurs in
the philosophical, and contemporary philosophical -- on the site of a former scientific. In
indeed, when political economy examines the question of the relationship between
the value and price, biology studies the correlation of structures and features within
biological organization of living beings, and Philology seeks to understand
the relationship of formal structures with verbal values, thus science XX
century involved the dismemberment of the space, where classic
the episteme stretched the continuity of the relationship between thinking and
being. And the place where formerly housed the scientific discipline, now
fill the philosophical discipline cycle: the problems of formalization now
connected with the analysis of relationships between logic and ontology, issues
interpretation -- identifying the ratio of time and sense, etc.
Post a Comment