Where previously we studied the power of the verb, its ability the output of the discourse beyond its own limits and rooting it in Genesis submission, now comes the analysis of the internal grammatical structures inherent in each language and establishing it as an independent entity, that is, on a private basis. Similarly, the theory of inflections, search own laws changing words now replace the old study of General the dismemberment of words and things; the theory of the basis is replaced by the root analysis- views; finally, explain the relationship of languages by adjacency -- where before was looking for the boundless continuity derivations. In other words, everything that once functioned in the plane of relations between things (data representation) and words (with their ability to Express views) is enclosed inside the language to ensure its internal laws. At the level of the foundations of the four segments of the theory of discourse yet preserved: the new dimension of a person they serve to identify the relations to things are not worse than in the classical age, but now they change the opposite way. It is, in fact, not about to re-place them in the inner space of the language but how to release them from the field of view in which they closed, and to identify them in the external dimension, where the person manifests itself as something finite, definite, sucked into the thickness of what they thought, subordinate in its very existence scattering time.
1 comment:
Where previously we studied the power of the verb, its ability
the output of the discourse beyond its own limits and rooting it in
Genesis submission, now comes the analysis of the internal
grammatical structures inherent in each language and establishing
it as an independent entity, that is, on a private basis.
Similarly, the theory of inflections, search own laws
changing words now replace the old study of General
the dismemberment of words and things; the theory of the basis is replaced by the root analysis-
views; finally, explain the relationship of languages by
adjacency -- where before was looking for the boundless continuity
derivations. In other words, everything that once functioned in
the plane of relations between things (data representation) and
words (with their ability to Express views) is
enclosed inside the language to ensure its internal
laws. At the level of the foundations of the four segments of the theory of discourse yet
preserved: the new dimension of a person they serve to identify the
relations to things are not worse than in the classical age, but now
they change the opposite way. It is, in fact, not about
to re-place them in the inner space of the language
but how to release them from the field of view in
which they closed, and to identify them in the external dimension, where
the person manifests itself as something finite, definite, sucked into
the thickness of what they thought, subordinate in its very existence
scattering time.
Post a Comment