Kerala CPI MLA Geetha Gopi faces flak over daughter's lavish ...
The Indian Express-Jun. 7, 2017
The party has said it was unbecoming of a communist leader to host such a luxurious wedding. The wedding took place recently at the Poothanam Auditorium in ...
Julianne Hough's Wedding, By the Numbers
Brides.com-Jul. 11, 2017
Hough's wedding was definitely as lavish as her glittery DWTS costumes. Wearing a custom Marchesa wedding dress, Hough boarded a boat with her honey on ...
Arsenal's Jack Wilshere shares stunning snap of lavish Italian ...
Independent.ie-Jun. 19, 2017
Arsenal's Jack Wilshere shares stunning snap of lavish Italian wedding ... has tied the knot with girlfriend Andriani Michael at a lavish three-day bash in Italy.
1 comment:
All subjects are equal.
The concept of "equality" means that each is complete and independent of the subject makes horizontal communication. When stakeholders meet in court, it is against the law they are equal, as well as the law in relation to them are equal, ie still allows it to interpret. But we are talking only about those subjects which are elements of the common system. It is clear that in themselves and combined they do not equal the total of the system: they have different functions and tasks in the process of interaction.
-- Each actor sells primarily its own intereSy.
The subject simply cannot realize the interests of another subject, he can realize other's interests just as their own. In other words, only if the interests of the subjects match, then there is a realization of interests of each entity. The young man can not realize all interests of the girl when meeting, it may implement only that portion of its interests, which coincide with his interests, i.e. they are shared for everyone. So when the authorities say that they are first and foremost the public interest, the interests of the people, society or some social entities, they're just lying. They sell primarily their own interests and the public or, more precisely, the interests of other stakeholders, such as companies, pensioners, servicemen, etc., are implemented only if they at some point coincide with their interests. Otherwise it can not be, for each subject, it is necessary to say that again, can (and should) implement only their own interests.
And how those interests which do not coincide with the interests of power? There's only one way: the subjects of society and its individual social formations should not implement the interests of the government if they do not coincide with their interests. This means that the relationship between subjects such as society and government should be structured in such a way that the realization of common interests can be done only when are realized the interests of each of the interacting agents. In contrast to existing relationships when the government has the ability to subordinate their interests to the interests of other actors. Suffer and those and others, and all together lose.
Thus, the Soviet trade was not interested in serving the interests of the population, since it met their needs and thereby their interests in other ways. Suffered from this whole society, and may be because of this (at least as one of the dominant reasons) and there was a revolution in Russia in 1991. But as soon as the trade was set in such a relationship when she began to realize their interests through the implementation of the interests of the population and the whole society, all or almost all only benefit from this.
It was in this situation needs to be delivered and the subjects of power (officials, bureaucrats), and all the power. But this is a special issue that requires more attention, and which I hope very shortly to engage in the most direct way.
Post a Comment