None of the provisions contained in this passage, I can't agree If the inheritance of "functional and structural decline in General not contested", the half of my article would be useless, and if the inheritance of "the growing ability and development" caused by use, it was recognized as "illustrated by many examples", then the other half my work would be unnecessary. Both exposed to challenge; and if not positively rejected, at least, applies unproven. Greyhounds dog and the punter does not constitute a valid evidence, because their features owe their origin to artificial selection more than any other reason. Indeed, it may be questioned whether the greyhounds use their legs more than other dogs. Dogs of all breeds constantly running around, chasing each other and gain the agility, and, moreover, other dogs more often than greyhounds, which don't like to indulge in the game the Instances in which greyhounds exercise their legs in hunting for hares, occupy only a minor place in their lives, and can to play only a minor role in the development of their feet. And then, as well to explain their heads are long and pointed noses? Were they evolved under the effects of running? The structure of the greyhounds is explained as a result, the main way of selection changes arising randomly from the unknown reasons other the same way it can not be explained. Even more obvious the failure of links of the Duke Urgalskogo on the punter and setters. Is it possible to claim that their olfactory organs are exercising more than appropriate authorities from the other dogs?
1 comment:
None of the provisions contained in this passage, I can't
agree If the inheritance of "functional and structural decline in General
not contested", the half of my article would be useless, and if
the inheritance of "the growing ability and development" caused by use,
it was recognized as "illustrated by many examples", then the other half
my work would be unnecessary. Both exposed to challenge; and if
not positively rejected, at least, applies
unproven. Greyhounds dog and the punter does not constitute a valid
evidence, because their features owe their origin to
artificial selection more than any other reason. Indeed,
it may be questioned whether the greyhounds use their legs more than
other dogs. Dogs of all breeds constantly running around, chasing each other and
gain the agility, and, moreover, other dogs more often than greyhounds, which
don't like to indulge in the game the Instances in which greyhounds exercise their legs in
hunting for hares, occupy only a minor place in their lives, and can
to play only a minor role in the development of their feet. And then, as well
to explain their heads are long and pointed noses? Were they evolved under
the effects of running? The structure of the greyhounds is explained as a result, the main
way of selection changes arising randomly from the unknown
reasons other the same way it can not be explained. Even more obvious
the failure of links of the Duke Urgalskogo on the punter and setters.
Is it possible to claim that their olfactory organs are exercising more than
appropriate authorities from the other dogs?
Post a Comment