Is made clear as in the data conditions, the weight of the mercury column is balanced by the weight of atmospheric column, having equal diameter, and how if you change the weight of the atmospheric column occurs the corresponding change in weight of a mercury column that you specify changing heights. Moreover after this, it becomes clear that to ascribe the raising of the balloon relative ease error. The fact that such an explanation is omitted of mind is directed up pressure, which is due to the difference between the weight of the mass gas enclosed in the balloon, plus a cylindrical column of air that extends above him to the limits of the atmosphere, and the weight of the same cylindrical air post extending down (away from the boundaries of the atmosphere) to the surface of the globe, this the difference in weight and causing an equivalent upward pressure on the lower surface of the ball. Why I introduce these truisms, it is not related to the subject my narrative? First, I am doing it to show the contrast between the uncertain representation of the causes of this phenomenon and among its precise understanding or, more correctly speaking, the contrast between this understanding the reasons for that, rather, there is a simple classification of the phenomena with others or other phenomena, familiarity with which gives the illusion of understanding, and the understanding of the causes, which is based on certain physical the forces that allow measurement. Secondly, I'm doing this to show that when we seek to lay out clear words the reason for it is valid factors, we gain not only a clear decision in front of us tasks, but thereby opened the way to solving various other problems. Until we are satisfied neanalizuojant reasons, we can to be confident in the fact that we do not understand properly the origin of private effects attributed to these reasons, and that we overlook other effects which open before us, if we were dealing with analyzed reasons. This is especially true in relation to the cases in which the causation of complex phenomena. From this we can deduce the conclusion that the phenomenon delivered by development types cannot be properly understood, if you do not have in mind the force at the time the specific forces let us Consider the facts with which we are dealing.
1 comment:
Is made clear as in the data
conditions, the weight of the mercury column is balanced by the weight of atmospheric column,
having equal diameter, and how if you change the weight of the atmospheric column
occurs the corresponding change in weight of a mercury column that you specify
changing heights. Moreover after this, it becomes clear that
to ascribe the raising of the balloon relative ease error.
The fact that such an explanation is omitted of mind is directed
up pressure, which is due to the difference between the weight of the mass
gas enclosed in the balloon, plus a cylindrical column of air that extends
above him to the limits of the atmosphere, and the weight of the same cylindrical air
post extending down (away from the boundaries of the atmosphere) to the surface of the globe, this
the difference in weight and causing an equivalent upward pressure on
the lower surface of the ball.
Why I introduce these truisms, it is not related to the subject
my narrative? First, I am doing it to show the contrast
between the uncertain representation of the causes of this phenomenon and among its
precise understanding or, more correctly speaking, the contrast between this understanding
the reasons for that, rather, there is a simple classification of the phenomena with others
or other phenomena, familiarity with which gives the illusion of understanding,
and the understanding of the causes, which is based on certain physical
the forces that allow measurement. Secondly, I'm doing this to show that
when we seek to lay out clear words the reason for it is valid
factors, we gain not only a clear decision in front of us
tasks, but thereby opened the way to solving various other problems.
Until we are satisfied neanalizuojant reasons, we can
to be confident in the fact that we do not understand properly the origin of private
effects attributed to these reasons, and that we overlook
other effects which open before us, if we were dealing with
analyzed reasons. This is especially true in relation to
the cases in which the causation of complex phenomena. From this we can deduce
the conclusion that the phenomenon delivered by development types cannot be
properly understood, if you do not have in mind the force at the time the specific
forces let us Consider the facts with which we are dealing.
Post a Comment