Clamp plate printing press must move up and down on distance of an inch or so; it is necessary that it produced the greatest pressure, when you reach the limit of the downward movement. If anyone will consider printing workshop presses, you will see half a dozen different mechanical devices that meet the same purpose; and a competent machinist tell him that it's easy to come up with the same amount. If, therefore, no the necessary correlation between the special machine parts, they must to be even less than between the parts of the body. From the opposite point of view, we found the same truth. Holding the above analogy, we can conclude that a change in one part of the the body certainly does not require known specific series of changes in other parts of the. Cuvier says: "none of these parts can not be changed without changing the other, and consequently, each taken separately determines all the rest". The first of these sentences can be tolerated, but the second masquerading as a consequence of it, is incorrect; it assumes that "all the other" can be changed only one way, and as they can be changed in various ways and to varying degrees. To prove so, we must resort to analogies from the field of mechanics. Place a brick upright and push it - you can predict with precision, in what direction will it fall and what will take position.
1 comment:
Clamp plate printing press must move up and down on
distance of an inch or so; it is necessary that it produced the greatest
pressure, when you reach the limit of the downward movement. If anyone will
consider printing workshop presses, you will see half a dozen different
mechanical devices that meet the same purpose; and a competent machinist
tell him that it's easy to come up with the same amount. If, therefore, no
the necessary correlation between the special machine parts, they must
to be even less than between the parts of the body.
From the opposite point of view, we found the same truth. Holding
the above analogy, we can conclude that a change in one part of the
the body certainly does not require known specific series of changes in
other parts of the. Cuvier says: "none of these parts can not be changed
without changing the other, and consequently, each taken separately determines
all the rest". The first of these sentences can be tolerated, but the second
masquerading as a consequence of it, is incorrect; it assumes that "all
the other" can be changed only one way, and as they
can be changed in various ways and to varying degrees. To prove
so, we must resort to analogies from the field of mechanics.
Place a brick upright and push it - you can predict with
precision, in what direction will it fall and what will take position.
Post a Comment