Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Story image for royal wedding from Express.co.uk

Princess Beatrice royal wedding: Will Princess Beatrice be the ...

Express.co.uk-May 22, 2019
Seven months on, the couple have made their first royal appearance together after they attended Lady Gabriella's wedding as a couple. But will Princess ...
Story image for royal wedding from HELLO!

How the Countess of Wessex's royal wedding inspired future ...

HELLO!-Jun. 19, 2019
In the 20 years that have passed there have since been a handful of royal weddings including those of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, Duke and Duchess ...
Story image for royal wedding from STLtoday.com

Photos from history: Royal Wedding of Princess Elizabeth

STLtoday.com-7 hours ago
On Nov. 20, 1947, Britain's future queen, Princess Elizabeth, married Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, at Westminster Abbey. The ceremony was recorded and ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

Our General ideas, says Buffon, "refer to an unbroken chain
objects in which we can clearly distinguish only medium units
because of its extreme articulation is slipping away more and more from
our consideration... the more will increase the number
operation of natural entities, the more likely will approach the
the truth, as in nature, there are really only individuals, and
clans, groups, classes exist only in our imagination"<$FB u
f f o n. Discours sur la maniere de traiter l'histoire naturelle
(CEuvres completes, t. I, p. 36, 39).>. Bonn in de sense
he said that "in nature there are no jumps: it all happens here
gradually, all nuanced. If between two any
beings there was the gap, what would be the basis for
the transition from one to the other? Thus, there is no such thing
over and under which not, there would be others that are closer to the
it one of the signs and removed for others." You can always
find "secondary education": the polyps are located between the plant and
animals -- the flying squirrel between the bird and the quadruped, the monkey
- among quadrupeds and man. Hence, our
distribution of individuals by types and classes "are purely
nominal", they represent only "funds
meet our needs and the limitations of our
knowledge"<$FC h. B o n n e t. Contemplation de la nature, Ire
partie (CEuvres completes, t. IV, h. 35--36).>.
In the XVIII century the continuity of nature was a requirement of all
natural history, that is, any attempt to enter in the nature
the order and open the General category, which would be
valid and it was recommended to be obvious differences or would have been
comfortable and just isolate our imagination
the differentiations. Only continuity can guarantee
the repeatability of nature, and therefore, the possibility for structure
be a symptom. But this requirement immediately forks. After all
if it were possible due to the continuous motion of experience in
exactly, step by step, to trace a continuous series of individuals,
of varieties, species, genera, classes, then there would be
need to create science, since the data in the description
designations were summarized with the full law and the language of things
through spontaneous movement was constituted as a scientific would
it.