Sweden Royal Wedding: Sofia Hellqvist Becomes a Princess
HarpersBAZAAR.com (blog)-Jun. 14, 2015
Sweden's Prince Carl Philip and Sofia Hellqvist tied the knot in the chapel of the Royal Palace in Stockholm on June 13—and it was in epic style, reports People.
Benedict Cumberbatch hints that Tom Hiddleston WAS his ...
Daily Mail-Feb. 16, 2015
The 38-year-old actor is believed to be enjoying a low-key honeymoon with pregnant wife Sophie Hunter on the Isle of Wight following their intimate wedding ...
Happy birthday Prince William: ten facts about the royal
hellomagazine.com-Jun. 23, 2015
The night before his royal wedding, the Prince revealed he only got 30 minutes sleep: "I hadn't slept at all that night because obviously all the crowds were on ...
Swedish royal wedding menu to be prepared by famous ...
HELLO! Canada-Jun. 12, 2015
Their wedding ceremony will take place the following day at 4.30pm at the royal chapel in Stockholm. After the church ceremony, Carl Philip and Sofia, 30, will ...
1 comment:
Here
this objection, I believe, is justified - and I tried
to assess the assumptions and implications in the text, which should soon
to appear*. There I am trying to set the status of the larger discursive unities -
such as those what is called Natural history or Political
savings. I asked myself, in accordance with what methods, with what
tools you would be able to locate them, to dismember, to analyze them and
to describe. Here is the first part of the work undertaken a few years ago and now
finished.
But another question arises: the question of the author - and this is what I wanted
would now to talk to you. This concept of the author constitutes an important
moment of individualization in history of ideas, knowledge, literature, as well as in
the history of philosophy and science. Even today, when dealing with history
any concept, or literary genre, or any type
philosophy, those of unity, I think, consider as
dismemberment is relatively weak, secondary, and superimposed on the primary
durable and fundamental unity, namely, unity of the author and
works.
I will leave aside, at least in today's report
historical-sociological analysis of the character of the author. How the author
have indiwidualiziruyutza in a culture like ours, what status he was
a dowry of, say, become engaged in the search for authenticity and
attribution, in a system of valorization the author was taken, at which point began
to tell you life has no heroes, but authors how established this
the fundamental category of criticism, "man and work" - all this,
no doubt, would deserve to be analyzed. In the present
the point I would like to consider only the relation of the text to the author, the way
text which outlines the course to the figure - figure, in relation to
it is external and prior, at least in appearance. The wording
topics that I would like to start, I borrow from Beckett: "What's the difference
who says - someone said - what's the difference who says".
Post a Comment