The Fug Girls on a Century of Royal Weddings
TIME-Apr. 7, 2015
But living a fairy tale isn't always so easy — something we explore in our new novel The Royal We, which opens on the eve of a royal wedding that may not ...
Kate Middleton's home village in uproar over 'eyesore' gate ...
Telegraph.co.uk-Dec. 1, 2015
They were supposed to be a striking tribute to the marriage of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, crowned with acorns to mark the beginnings of a new royal ...
The royal marriage that almost never happened
Express.co.uk-Jul. 25, 2015
For almost seven decades Prince Philip has been at the Queen's side and a bedrock of the Royal Family. It's a marriage that has stood the test of time while ...
The lavish lifestyle of India's royalty
BBC News-Mar. 6, 2015
Possibly the most opulent wedding in the history of independent India, .... Watch Rupa Jha's full documentary A Royal Wedding: Indian Style at 04:30 GMT and ...
1 comment:
These differences may be related to the following fact: the name of the author is
not just an element of discourse, one that can be the subject or
Supplement, which can be replaced by a pronoun, etc.; it performs
in relation to descurcam a role: it provides the function of
classification; such a name allows you to group a set of texts, to distinguish between
them to exclude from their number one and contrast them to others. In addition, it
casts the text in a certain relationship between them. Hermes
Trismegistus did not exist, Hippocrates too, in the sense in which
would have to say about Balzac that he existed, but that the number of texts
put under one name, means that between them have established a relationship
homogeneity or continuity that establish the authenticity of some texts
through the other, or mutual explanation, or concomitant
use. Finally, the author's name functions to characterize
a certain way of being of discourse: for discourse the fact that it has a name
the author is the fact that you can say: "It was written by so-and-so", or:
"So-and-so is the author of this", means that this discourse is not ordinary
care about the speech, not the speech that goes, swims and runs, not speech
immediately consumed, but what does it say about the speech, which
be taken in a particular manner and must obtain in a given culture
a certain status. At this point one would come in the end
the idea that the name of the author is not, like the name of your own, from the inside
some discourse to the real and exterior individual who produced it,
but what it seeks in some way to the border of the texts that it
cuts
Post a Comment