Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from cosmopolitan.com (UK)

The *Real* Story Behind How Meghan Markle Chose Her ...

cosmopolitan.com (UK)-Oct. 27, 2018
We all know that Meghan Markle married Prince Harry at St George's Chapel on May 19 wearing a Givenchy wedding gown. Now the iconic dress and veil, ...
Story image for iconic gown from 9Honey

The most iconic Emmys dresses of all time

9Honey-Sep. 16, 2018
From Joan Collins wearing the ultimate 80's look in a gold gown with shoulder pads and sweetheart neckline in 1986, to the midriff baring two piece from Emilio ...
Story image for iconic gown from Brides.com

Meghan Markle Reportedly Doesn't Want to Upstage Kate ...

Brides.com-Mar. 23, 2018
Meghan Markle Reportedly Doesn't Want to Upstage Kate Middleton's Iconic Wedding Dress ... “She understands what the perception will be of this gown. I don't ...
Story image for iconic gown from HELLO! Canada

Duchess Kate's wedding dress look-alike is available at H&M

HELLO! Canada-Apr. 3, 2018
HELLO! has spotted one dress in particular that looks remarkably similar to the iconic gown Kate wore when her and Prince William exchanged vows in 2011.

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

Naturally, all the sounds of the world, both of the living and of natural origin, had and have their own characteristics, scope and purpose. With the increasing complexity of the world of man and of the range of his actions, complicated for humans and the world of sounds. More precisely, he gradually took more and more diverse number of sounds. And thereby increasingly enriched their vision of the world. But it is important to stress that the sounds are always in their totality have a certain uniformity that characterize the existence of objects of inanimate nature and a class of actions of subjects of nature.

Each group had its own characteristics in sound. This is natural, because different physical nature of phenomena in contact with other physical objects published their special sounds, typical for this kind of action, and thus always recognizable. So, probably the first were the sounds, with a sense of danger, breeding, food production, etc. These sound features transmitted from one object to another object, or rather was present in all objects of this group.

And if the man heard only part of the same series of sounds, then, as we have said a little above, it is immediately associated with a corresponding group of sounds, and then the group of phenomena, and therefore with the relevant objects and entities external to the it environment. Due to this, a person could distinguish between classes of meanings of action, and thus the meaning of their actions. It is only necessary to understand the model's advantage, but not absolute. One of the fundamental conditions for development is the need to maintain the minimum difference a new event from any time past event. However it always happens.

Further, sample sounds has established itself as the permanent and acquired a unique sound. Complex combination of sounds became words that described this phenomenon. Such sounds of words became more and more. The combination of a complex series of sounds became associated with words and speech. Accordingly, these sounds-words for a certain set of a person to certain actions. With the various number of sounds was determined by their stage in the deployment action. Accordingly, certain sounds have built a positive or negative emotional number with all your modifications. Thus it is not necessary to understand this relationship directly: the emotional series depends on many factors, where the sound may be dominant.

But here there is another fundamental point. In order to perceive sounds and the more they play man should have such a genetic or natural ability. In other words, it must be "gene" to hear the sounds and "gene" to play them, moreover, must be "gene" to build a multitude of sounds into a meaningful number. In other words, it must be a program listening and speaking program that gradually turned into speech. And this program is always present. This is called (according to Kant), program priori or a priori knowledge.