The rare romance of Scottish gold
Financial Times-Sep. 13, 2019
Blood-red spinel and black pearl drops on pavé diamond hoops (below) look ... that was often found in Victorian jewellery but seems appropriately modern.
The real Peaky Blinders
BBC History Magazine (blog)-Aug. 8, 2019
(Interestingly, by the late 1890s, the peaky blinder's uniform incorporated the pearl buttons ... Like all youth fashions, peaky blinder style had a limited shelf-life.
10 celebrity-approved bridal necklace designs to add to your ...
VOGUE India-Jan. 23, 2019
... opted for a Victorian version of the necklace design, created by Sabyasachi Jewelry, ... Opt for a combination of pearls and gemstones for maximum impact. ... Wear it for your pre-wedding functions, or with a Benarasi tunic for your first dinner ...
Kaia Gerber Looks All Grown Up Walking the Runway at Paris ...
Closer Weekly-Jan. 22, 2019
Not only did Kaia hit the runway at the British Fashion Awards but she was ... The Old Victorian-style dress was tastefully finished off with fur lining the sleeves and waist. ... To complete her Givenchy look, Kaia donned a pearl headpiece that ...
1 comment:
Adopted the sign or the predicate determines the dominant, but as such, it becomes a constant relative to the predicate, or characteristic. And if they interact, for example, in such General categories as time, it determines the nature and the objects themselves and their interaction.
If we say that it will rain tomorrow, it means that the concept of "tomorrow" is determined by the concept of "rain" and not otherwise. In other words, tomorrow we are only interested in terms that it will rain and it will be necessary to prepare for it. And all our actions for tomorrow, in the framework of this proposal will be determined only by the fact that it will rain, i.e. a common action will be to identify private actions: to take an umbrella, wear a raincoat, etc. But the concept of "rain" we are interested only in the framework of the concept of "tomorrow", today it is we do not care, although outside of the window (just the window), it can be a downpour.
We have shown previously that the main object is the Commission of any action (or non-action, i.e. the Commission of another action, not necessarily the opposite), but under certain conditions. An action is a mandatory entry in the interaction, without interaction with someone else no action is performed. Therefore, another object becomes some other action. But we have said that there is always a third object through which the action takes place. The third object is a third act. But every such action, and the first and second, and the third has a different character in the process of interaction, respectively, and has its own designation, i.e. each of them solves its own task.
Another feature: the offer is always part of the dialogue, and all the text is dialogue, regardless of whether committed it with my second or the first "I", or from an external entity. So doesn't matter, is dialogue explicitly (as did the famous Socrates, through Plato, the so-called Socratic method), or the dialogue is only implied, as it happens in a narrative text. The dialogue is a question-answering relations. It solves one, but very important task - to check the developed concept, the so-called practice. In other words, the truth of the sentence, i.e. its meaning, becomes accepted only when it is recognized as such by the content of others, to whom it is addressed.
Post a Comment